Gay Web Watch


Gay Web Watch05 Feb 2007 09:43 pm

Taking a quick break from anniversary festivities to direct you to a growing furor driven yet again by the GLBT Blogosphere concerning a disgustingly anti-gay advertising campaign launched during last night’s Super Bowl by M&M Mars, their advertising agency TBWA Chiat/Day New York (owned by the Omnicom Group), and the Snickers Public Relations agency Weber Shandwick (owned by the Interpublic Group).

I need to get back to celebrating, but Americablog’s John Aravosis gives the full rundown here.

And there’s more from fellow Rhodesian Ridgeback lover Pam Spaulding, Andy Towle, and Jeremy at Good As You.

UPDATE: The HRC (The largest US GLBT rights organization) has responded quickly, making a statement which you can read here.

UPDATE II: The site has been redirected, and the offensive videos have been taken down. Still no statement from neither of the marketing services agencies nor M&M/Mars. This situation isn’t over until we get an explanation, but the net-based pressure here produced a result. Every blogger, commenter, e-mailer and anyone else involved in this episode “flash activism” deserves both credit and thanks. More on this from John at Americablog.

UPDATE III: GLAAD finally has a press release out about this, including quotes from Pink Star Mother Judy Shepard. But here’s the rather interesting bit:

“In early January, TBWA\Chiat\Day New York asked GLAAD to review and provide analysis on a Snickers spot. GLAAD agreed. The next day, the agency abruptly withdrew its request without having shown GLAAD the ad.”

If I had to venture a guess, TBWA Chiat/Day did its job by speaking to GLAAD, but the Snickers client instructed TBWA (in one way or another) to stop talking to GLAAD. Or TBWA/Omnicom has really good friends at GLAAD.

UPDATE IV: New York Times article covering the backlash, including statement from Snickers parent Masterfoods.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Gay Web Watch02 Feb 2007 07:09 pm

I don’t believe in moderating comments and banning commenters on blogs. That doesn’t mean, however, that gay bloggers need to just take violent homophobic threats sitting down. Such is the case that is breaking throughout the gay blogosphere this U.S. morning.

It seems a Philadelphia man responded to the popular Good As You blogger Jeremy Hooper’s appearance on the gay news magazine In The Life by saying the following:

“I just saw your clip on T.V. I know your (sic) not going to change who you are. I know what I have to say, your (sic) not really going to give a shit about, however you have this site so I’m posting on it.

You CAN’T just expect everyone to be okay with you, and your life. Your (sic) a fag, and that (sic) fine, but keep it to yourself. Trust me, if I ever walk by you on the street with my kids and I see you kissing or holding hands with some dude, I’ll brake (sic) every bone in your gay little body. Keep your shit behind closed doors, so children can’t see you.

I know your (sic) going to say “oh here is another person who is out to hurt me because I’m gay, oh the life I have to live”. Your (sic) wrong dude, I’m just giving you the “kick in the pants” you like to give the rest of the world, as you said on the T.V show. Now Ms.Honest, how’s that for truth?”

The intrepid Jeremy has responded by sharing with his audience the results of a small sleuthing operation. By googling the commenter’s e-mail address, Jeremy found out that the commenter is one Nick Peronace who runs a business in Philadelphia called Enterprise Steaks.

This is probably the best handling of below-the-belt commenting on gay blogs I have seen, and I love that Jeremy didn’t take the inconsequential easy way out by merely deleting and banning in this hate-speech and physical threat-ridden case. I hope some of you will join the crowds that are sending polite, above-the-belt notes to the not-so-kind owner of Enterprise Steaks. I also hope that you bloggers out there remember what Jeremy did if you should be so unfortunate to have something like this happen to you.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Gay Web Watch24 Jan 2007 04:41 pm
From the superinclusive, superresponsive, supergay bloggers at Queerty:
Does Google Discriminate Against Gay Bloggers?
Steamy Ads Get Eight Blogs In Hot Water

We’re not sure what’s going on out there, but Scott from Scott-O-Rama sent us an email informing us that no less than eight gay blogs had been removed from internet giant Google’s Adsense - the service that places context-friendly ads on people’s websites.

It seems young Scott found himself banned due to his somewhat suggestive content. He writes:

I received the e-mail from Google about two weeks ago advising me that I had violated the AdSense Terms of Service (TOS) because my site contained adult or mature content. I thought they were referring to content on The Eye Candy Albums until I realized I wasn’t displaying Google ads over there. I was using a different ad provider on those pages.I wrote back to Google and asked them to please elaborate on my violation of the TOS. I also pleaded with them to reconsider their decision. A couple of days later I received their reply. The “adult content” they were referring to was the Eye Candy Mondays posts as well as an ad I have to my Amazon.com affiliate store (pictured)…They told me I would have to remove all that content to even be considered for reinstatement.

Scott would have no problem complying, if it weren’t for a number of hetero-sites that apparently violate the TOS, but have yet to be reprimanded. He’s found a small group of other banned bloggers and wants to know, dear reader, if you guys know of any other gay blogs that have been banned.What’s interesting about Google’s apparent interest in so-called decency is that it takes less than five seconds to find pictures of myriad sex acts in their image archives. But, you know the saying, do as I say, not as I doogle.

Amongst us gay podcasters and videobloggers, we’ve noticed that Google’s YouTube also seems to come down harder on us gays when it comes to deleting “offensive” videos as well. Hmmmmmm. More here.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Gay Web Watch18 Jan 2007 06:32 pm

In America, there has been an increasingly noisy call for ABC president Steve McPherson and US prime time television drama Grey’s Anatomy creator and executive producer Shonda Rimes to fire actor Isaiah Washington for an October incident in which he called gay cast member T.R. Knight a “faggot” (which Knight said earlier this week inspired him to come out of the closet), and subsequent denials and lame attempts at jokes at last Monday’s Golden Globe Awards. While I join the numerous calls for Washington to be fired, I am using this situation as my inaugural “gay web watch” post, as I am both encouraged and disappointed by the reaction to this situation.

The greater issue here, of course, is the acceptability of anti-gay slurs like “faggot” in everyday American culture. It is a far more accepted word, causing far less specific and measurable consequences for users of the epithet than the word “nigger” causes. The “other F Word” is used against mostly men, gay and straight alike, to emasculate and invalidate. The word perpetuates misogyny by devaluing femininity, perpetuates negative stereotypes about gay men, and continues to marginalize gay men – especially effeminate gay men – as the absolute lowest thing a young boy or man could be in any social structure. The word has its affect on gay male culture as well, partially causing the backlash against effeminate gay men for “ruining things” for their more masculine counterparts and (in my opinion) creating a social structure that values gay men that can “pass” more than more “sissy” gay men.

The use of the “other F word” is a silent epidemic. The problem is that those of us who have been consistently on the receiving end of such insults tend to be among the few who get the full extent of the word’s use. Ask any gay or effeminate male you may know, and I am sure a vast majority of them will tell you the use of the “other F word” was used frequently towards them as they grew up.

One would think that in these days of a highly organized, highly funded GLBTQ movement, there would have been a massive organizational and word-of-mouth campaign against the “other F word”, making the unacceptability of its use clear to the American public-at-large, and most especially to authority figures like teachers and media producers. The word is clearly and traditionally destructive, and its use is screaming to be marginalized in the same way the word “nigger” is in America. To accomplish this feat, however, takes bold public stands from individuals and organizations alike. I am sad to say that unlike other minorities, GLBTQ’s have not been as successful as other groups in this endeavor, and the organizational reaction to the situation with Isaiah Washington and all those connected to the controversy illustrates these failures.

The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD), is perceived by me and by many other GLBTQ’s as the organization that handles these sorts of situations. When the conflict on the set of Grey’s Anatomy arose in October, GLAAD said nothing. After Isaiah Washington’s antics at the Golden Globes, it took GLAAD two days to issue a tepid statement from GLAAD president Neil G. Guiliano that said, among other things: ‘We want to sit down with him and give him an opportunity to raise public awareness about the destructive impact of these kinds of anti-gay slurs. Over the past four months Washington has become part of a significant problem of anti-gay prejudice in this country. He has an opportunity now to be part of the solution.’.

GLAAD’s lack of immediate response after the alleged incident in October, and its rather weak statement yesterday only substantiate claims I hear from many GLBTQ’s that the organization has lost its focus and is not doing the job it is charged with doing for the GLBTQ population. Whatever efforts GLAAD makes to stop defamation of gays in the media and in everyday American conversation is dwarfed by the efforts and publicity it generates for it numerous star-studded Media Awards events. There are no visible spokespeople or thought leaders from GLAAD that are consistently defending GLBQ’s in the mainstream media as situations arise, and I and many others feel that GLAAD’s small amount of decisive and rapid-responding action and large amount of inaction when it comes to defending GLBTQ’s from vicious insults leaves us believing that cozying up to gay-friendly stars is far more important to the organization than causing real change by engaging with all types of GLBTQ defamation in all types of media.

The good news, however, is that the gay web is leading the charge here. Gay discussion boards, gay blogs covering themes such as news and gossip, and on GLBTQ user-generated media, people are taking the decisive stand that GLAAD is unwilling and/or seemingly afraid to take. Sentiments such as Andy Towle’s are being echoed throughout the gay web: “Unfortunately, the time for hand-holding and apologies has long passed. Washington had his opportunity to make amends over the remarks, and instead he chose to lie. Isaiah Washington needs to be fired from Grey’s Anatomy. It is past time for ABC to take action and show that they will not tolerate the use of hateful language towards gay people now, or at any point in the future.”

I am proud to be part of an web-based gay community that values standing up for itself more than it values its Hollywood connections, protecting itself from upsetting other people and can quickly answer continued and repeated bigotry with a bold stand. This web-based community deserves more attention, sponsorship and credit than it gets, and outdoing an organization with millions in its annual budget and the credibility of a long-standing history more than underlines that.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,